Every time I get assigned work, I feel like the first instruction I get is that Wikipedia is not to be used as a source or reference for the assignment. I understand why it is not regarded as a valuable source or credible information yet, as Wikipedia still has improvements to make in order to prove themselves as a totally reliable source of information, but I am beginning to feel that Wikipedia is improving as a research tool. In the past, I totally avoided using Wikipedia as a source of finding any information, academic or otherwise. However, more and more I do find myself accessing the site to find information about various different topics – from communication theories to rogue sharks in Australia. In my experience, I have found that the information is generally accepted as correct and accurate.
Although Wikipedia is a “wiki” and can be edited by anyone, there are rules and safeguarding practices that are in tact in order to ensure that information is accurate. With that being said, I think there is a greater amount of acceptance in the use of Wikipedia as a source of information currently. As a result there is more pressure on Wikipedia to ensure the information is accurate in order to protect their reputation. Do you think that Wikipedia is doing enough to ensure the information is accurate? If they were to do more, would it take away from the spirit of wikis? And lastly, Do you think that sooner than later students will be able to openly use Wikipedia as a source of information?